Go to Homepage
A Family of Community Newspapers Serving Fairfax and Loudoun Counties, Virginia
HomeCompany InfoAdvertising InfoClassifiedsFeedbackSearch


Weather
Sports
Viewpoints



Obituaries







Archives


Edition of November 11, 2005

Politicians Downplay Town Plan
RCA Still Confident Incorporating is Best Measure
By Sabrina Enayatulla Send Mail to Writer
Observer Staff Writer
The president of the Reston Citizens Association said this week he was confident that incorporating Reston into a town is the best thing for the community, even after Reston's three leading politicians were not as optimistic about the plan at a meeting Nov. 2.
Supervisor Cathy Hudgins (D-Hunter Mill) hosted a public meeting, along with Del. Ken Plum (D-36th) and Sen. Janet Howell (D-32nd), at South Lakes High School Nov. 2 to address the RCA-backed campaign to incorporate Reston.
But the three leaders each suggested there are substantial roadblocks to making Reston a town. Plum said getting approval from the state legislature for Reston to hold a referendum or become a town could be difficult because supporters have shown no clear reason for having a town, such as the need for an independent police force or better water or sewage facilities.
"Reston needs to be a town because …" said Plum, leaving it up to the RCA and others supporting the idea of incorporation to fill in the blank. "When you can fill in that sentence, it needs to stand alone."
Plum said those in favor of turning Reston into a town would need to be prepared to answer the question, "Why?"
But Mike Corrigan, president of RCA, said there wasn't just one reason for incorporation.
"It's not just a sound bite," Corrigan said. "There are about a thousand reasons, but we'll try to come as close as we can."
Corrigan said there were a few core issues facing Reston that make town status one of great importance. "Giving Reston one official voice, looking at the efficiency of services and new services, these are all major issues," he said.
Plum and Howell expressed concern over the role other organizations, such as Reston Association, the Greater Reston Chamber of Commerce and the Reston Community Center, would play in incorporating Reston, and what role they would play in the new town of Reston. They encouraged dialogue between those groups and RCA.
But Corrigan said he didn't feel it was necessary to have other organizations on board with RCA's plan to move forward. "I don't think it's important to have RA and the chamber come out positive for town status," Corrigan said. "Institutions don't vote. We have 622 people that think we should go to referendum."
Howell said she hoped RCA and citizens in favor of the new town were aware of what it takes in Virginia to become a town. After a two-year study in 1988, there was still no consensus on whether members of the community wanted a town. "This is a very complicated process," she said.
Virginia code requirements for creating a town state that "the population density of the county in which such community is located does not exceed 200 persons per square mile according to the last preceding United States census, or other census directed by the court…" "We cannot meet these standards," Hudgins said. Current figures show 2,455 people per square mile in Reston.
Hudgins also said laws governing the urban county executive form of government, which includes Fairfax County, say that once a town is incorporated, no other town or city can come into existence within the confines of the same county.
But Corrigan said he had no reason to feel pessimistic about the future of Reston. A 1980 charter that hoped to incorporate Reston into a town made it to referendum and Corrigan said he felt confident that can happen again. "We're hoping we can get co-sponsors from other members of the House and Senate," Corrigan said. "It was done in 1980, so it's not impossible. And I believe this is a non-partisan issue."
But there were others who didn't feel the same way. Leila Gordon, performing and fine arts director for the CenterStage and the Reston Community Center said her comments did not reflect the views of anyone but her own and said she didn't agree with giving Reston town status. "I love Reston, just the way it is," Gordon said. "It's the best place I've ever lived without the need for a city or town council, more bureaucrats and taxes. If it were up to me, I'd make Northern Virginia its own state and Reston would be the capital."
Corrigan said that the county came to the Nov. 2 meeting prepared to discuss a version of RCA's plan that had been modified substantially over the past five months, and officials had not been updated on the latest details. He also said RCA was not able to respond to the county's concerns because they were presented at the Nov. 2 meeting and not before.
"We've revised our document, so most of the things they're concerned with aren't even applicable anymore," Corrigan said. "We're not asking them to be enthusiastic, we just don't want them to oppose it."
On Friday, Nov. 4, Supervisor Hudgins attended a legislative subcommittee meeting with other board members where she gave her colleagues a copy of the letter from RCA given to her along with Del. Plum and Sen. Howell. A draft bill from RCA was also included as an attachment. Hudgins said she and her colleagues did not discuss RCA's proposal at Friday's meeting.
According to the handout on Fairfax County's response to RCA's proposal, RCA proposes to use the existing boundaries of Small District No. 5, the special tax district that supports the activities of the Reston Community Center, as the boundaries of a new town.
The proposed town would use the structure and powers typically available by charter to Virginia town governments, and they recommend using the charter of the Town of Clinchco, Va., as a model for the charter of the new Reston.
RCA also proposed that a referendum be conducted in Small District No. 5 on whether to adopt a new town government. If the new town were established, then a new town government would assume the facilities and functions of Small District No. 5, including any outstanding credits and debts, and the maintenance of various areas now owned and maintained by various associations of private property owners.
The proponents also assume that Fairfax County would continue to provide full county services to the new town, including fire and rescue services, libraries, police and schools, issue building permits and inspect buildings and review site plans and subdivision plats and provide staff support for some aspects of planning and zoning that may be done by the county under contract.
RCA also proposes that the new town use revenues from various sources to provide supplemental programs and to maintain the common areas that are now maintained by private associations of homeowners.
As a benefit, RCA has said after the formation of the new town and after the town's assumption for responsibility for maintaining common areas, homeowners' association dues would be largely replaced by property tax payments for similar maintenance and that such tax payments would then by deductible on federal and state income tax returns.
Fairfax County's legislative package will become public on Nov. 16 and the only public hearing about it will be held after the Board of Supervisors meeting on Nov. 21. Any changes that need to be made to the legislative package will be made on Dec. 5, and it is to be presented to the Fairfax County delegation to the General Assembly on Dec. 7.
Two-thirds of the House of Delegates and Senate will need to be in favor of the proposed charter to take it to referendum.

 

Copyright © 2005 The Herndon Publishing Company

Back to top | Back to previous page


Home | Company Info | Advertising | Classifieds | Feedback | Search
Weather | Sports | Entertainment | Viewpoints | Obituaries | Milestones | Community Guide | Cookbook | History | Photo Album

Copyright © 2003 The Herndon Publishing Company
(703) 437-5886